Subject: [PATCH] RS485: fix inconsistencies in the meaning of some variables

From: [email-masked] (Jesper Nilsson)
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:34:44 +0100

On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 04:45:46PM +0100, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> Subject: RS485: fix inconsistencies in the meaning of some variables
> From: Claudio Scordino <[email-masked]>
> 
> The crisv10.c and the atmel_serial.c serial drivers intepret the fields of the
> serial_rs485 structure in a different way.
> In particular, crisv10.c uses SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND and
> SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND for the voltage of the RTS pin; atmel_serial.c, instead,
> uses these values to know if a delay must be set before and after sending.
> This patch makes the usage of these variables consistent across all drivers and
> fixes the Documentation as well.
> >From now on, SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND and SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND will be used to
> set the voltage of the RTS pin (as in the crisv10.c driver); the delay will be
> understood by looking only at the value of delay_rts_before_send and
> delay_rts_after_send.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Darron Black <[email-masked]>

Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <[email-masked]>

/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
-- 
               Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson at axis.com