Subject: Common clock API for i.MX

From: [email-masked] (Mark Brown)
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:52:02 +0000

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:42:20AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I do think that this is a big part of the issue, the patches have been
> > floating around for ages and it's not clear when they'll manage to make
> > it in (and hence when it'll be worth moving to use them).

> Maybe because nobody is actively promoting them and pushing them 
> forward?  It is not sufficient to just post patches to a mailing list 
> and wait.

Yeah, it's a chicken and egg situation - it seems very difficult for
them to get integrated so few people are spending much time on them
which means it's not obvious that there's a pressing need for them :(
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120125/3677c32e/attachment.sig>