Subject: [PATCH] sched: generalize CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING for X86 and ARM

From: [email-masked] (Yong Zhang)
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:51:03 +0800

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:18:33PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:48:34AM -0800, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> > Generalize CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING  between X86 and
> > ARM, move "noirqtime=" option to common debugging code.
> > For a bit of backward compatibility, "tsc=noirqtime"
> > is preserved, but issues a warning.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Venki Pallipadi <[email-masked]>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c |    3 +++
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig              |   11 -----------
> >  arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c         |    7 ++++---
> >  include/linux/sched.h         |    2 ++
> >  lib/Kconfig.debug             |   12 ++++++++++++
> >  lib/Makefile                  |    2 ++
> >  lib/irqtime.c                 |   12 ++++++++++++
> >  7 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 lib/irqtime.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c b/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c
> > index 5416c7c..56d2a9d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c
> > @@ -162,5 +162,8 @@ void __init sched_clock_postinit(void)
> >  	if (read_sched_clock == jiffy_sched_clock_read)
> >  		setup_sched_clock(jiffy_sched_clock_read, 32, HZ);
> >  
> > +	if (!no_sched_irq_time)
> > +		enable_sched_clock_irqtime();
> 
> Why are you placing this here?  sched_clock is available from the point
> that it's registered, which should be before the first sched_clock()
> call.
> 
> > +config IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> > +	bool "Fine granularity task level IRQ time accounting"
> > +	depends on (X86 || (ARM && HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK))
> 
> Even though it's not bad here, please get out of the habbit of throwing
> unnecessary parens into the mix.  It can make stuff more difficult to
> read and therefore confirm correctness.  (I've spent many a time
> rewriting if() statements because of paren overuse.)
> 
> This could have been written:
> 
> 	depends on X86 || (ARM && HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK)
> 
> However, ARM will always have HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK after the next merge window,
> so this can become a much simpler:
> 
> 	depends on X86 || ARM

Maybe we can hand the depend-things to every ARCH, say let ARCH provides
HAVE_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING. Thus we can make IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
denpend on HAVE_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING.

Thanks,
Yong

> 
> Apart from these two points, the rest of the patch looks fine to me but
> the ultimate decision about its acceptability is up to other people.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Only stand for myself