Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add mmc controller nodes and board data

From: [email-masked] (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:49:00 -0800

* Rajendra Nayak <[email-masked]> [120223 19:29]:
> On Friday 24 February 2012 12:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
> >>@@ -113,5 +113,31 @@
> >>  			#size-cells =<0>;
> >>  			ti,hwmods = "i2c3";
> >>  		};
> >>+
> >>+		mmc1: mmc at 1 {
> >>+			compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
> >>+			ti,hwmods = "mmc1";
> >>+			ti,dual-volt;
> >>+		};
> >>+
> >>+		mmc2: mmc at 2 {
> >>+			compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
> >>+			ti,hwmods = "mmc2";
> >>+		};
> >>+
> >>+		mmc3: mmc at 3 {
> >>+			compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
> >>+			ti,hwmods = "mmc3";
> >>+		};
> >>+
> >>+		mmc4: mmc at 4 {
> >>+			compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
> >>+			ti,hwmods = "mmc4";
> >>+		};
> >>+
> >>+		mmc5: mmc at 5 {
> >>+			compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
> >>+			ti,hwmods = "mmc5";
> >>+		};
> >>  	};
> >>  };
> >
> >These all should all be "ti,omap3-hsmmc" I guess?
> 
> Well, I defined the binding such that both omap2 and omap3
> can use the same compatible "ti,omap2-hsmmc" since there is
> no difference in the way they are defined or handled. If thats
> confusing, I can have separate compatibles.
> Btw, I guess we do the same with a few other re-used IPs as well,
> I just checked and mcpsi does the same.

Yeah let's use separate compatibles to avoid confusion.
For omap2 we also have the ti,omap2-mmc in addition to
ti,omap2-hsmmc..

Regards,

Tony