Subject: [PATCH v4 07/10] pwm: tegra: Add device tree support

From: [email-masked] (Thierry Reding)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:48:07 +0100

* Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 09:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Add auxdata to instantiate the PWFM controller from a device tree,
> > include the corresponding nodes in the dtsi files for Tegra 20 and
> > Tegra 30 and add binding documentation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email-masked]>
> 
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/tegra-pwm.txt
> 
> Can this please be named nvidia,tegra20-pwm.txt so that if we need
> different bindings for any future Tegra PWM, we won't have any filename
> conflicts?

That file already documents the bindings for Tegra 20 and Tegra 30, that's
why I chose the move generic name. Could this perhaps be documented within
the file instead? Or should I rather add a nvidia,tegra30-pwm.txt with a
reference to the nvidia,tegra20-pwm.txt?

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120320/5482017f/attachment.sig>