From: arnd@arndb•de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:34:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204171434.06178.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1334660431.git.viresh.kumar@st.com>
On Tuesday 17 April 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> SPEAr now supports common clock framework. This patchset contains changes
> related to this. It also contain few dependency commits for clock framework that
> are earlier sent separately.
>
> @Mike: It would be easiest to get these through ARM-SoC tree. So, would need
> your Acked-by on these patches. But firstly they must get reivewed :)
We should agree on how we want to do the common clk patches for v3.5.
The two options I see are either we take all the patches that Mike
Acks into arm-soc, or Mike applies the patches in his own tree and
submits them to arm-soc. I think either way is fine for me, but
some people might feel strongly one way or another.
> MAINTAINERS | 4 +-
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/clock.c | 1354 +++++++++--------------
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/include/mach/generic.h | 4 +-
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/include/mach/misc_regs.h | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/include/mach/spear.h | 13 +
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear300.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear310.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear320.c | 12 +-
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear3xx.c | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/clock.c | 1015 +++++------------
> arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/include/mach/misc_regs.h | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/spear6xx.c | 5 +-
> arch/arm/plat-spear/Makefile | 3 +-
> arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-aux-synth.c | 195 ++++
> arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-frac-synth.c | 156 +++
> arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-gpt-synth.c | 145 +++
> arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-vco-pll.c | 346 ++++++
> arch/arm/plat-spear/clock.c | 1005 -----------------
I wonder: should the clock drivers remain part of the platform directory,
or get moved into a subdirectory of drivers/clk? I was assuming that
we'd do the latter, but I haven't been following the clk discussions
that closely.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 11:15 [PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 01/13] CLKDEV: Add helper routines to allocate and add clkdevs for given struct clk * Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 02/13] clk: Fix typo in comment Viresh Kumar
2012-04-18 21:04 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 03/13] " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] clk: clk-private: Add DEFINE_CLK macro Viresh Kumar
2012-04-18 21:01 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 05/13] clk: clk-gate: Create clk_gate_endisable() Viresh Kumar
2012-04-18 21:02 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] clk: Don't set clk->new_rate twice Viresh Kumar
2012-04-18 21:08 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 07/13] clk: clk_set_rate() must fail if CLK_SET_RATE_GATE is set and clk is enabled Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 08/13] SPEAr: clk: Add VCO-PLL Synthesizer clock Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 09/13] SPEAr: clk: Add Auxiliary " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 18:51 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-17 20:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-18 20:01 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 10/13] SPEAr: clk: Add Fractional " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 11/13] SPEAr: clk: Add General Purpose Timer " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 13/13] SPEAr: Call clk_prepare() before calling clk_enable Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 17:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-04-18 21:17 ` Turquette, Mike
[not found] ` <CAOh2x=maawrRjHhE3oGXfMOvsUbCkp9gWA_Kq-S0Dh7r6co6VA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-19 18:56 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-17 14:34 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-04-17 14:57 ` [PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework Shawn Guo
2012-04-18 20:49 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-18 20:45 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-18 21:13 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-18 21:22 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-18 21:25 ` Turquette, Mike
[not found] ` <CAOh2x=nhZLQejWJb1Wdv=G9vU0hq+8CO0SSx95qQUJogL5ftNQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-19 0:17 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-19 8:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-19 9:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-04-19 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-19 19:01 ` Turquette, Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201204171434.06178.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox