Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: anatop: permit adata be NULL when access register

From: [email-masked] (Mark Brown)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:08:36 +0100

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:51:38AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:

> From what I see, it's reasonable.  Then the immediate question I have
> is, should we remove "struct anatop *adata" from anatop_read_reg and
> anatop_write_reg completely?

Given the way these things tend to go it's probably guaranteeing that
your next round of SoCs will have two register compatible anatop blocks :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120514/f89fb098/attachment.sig>