Subject: [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflect Device Tree

From: [email-masked] (Mark Brown)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:03:03 +0100

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:58:44PM +0800, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Lee Jones <[email-masked]> wrote:

> > + ? ? ? { .name = "ab8500_ldo_ana", ? ? .driver_data = (void *) AB8500_LDO_ANA, },

> So why is the device tree going to use these lowercase names etc?
> I guess there is a rationale...

If we are changing the names then not including the ab8500 bit would
seem more idiomatic - we've already worked out which chip this is by the
time we're looking here.

> Anyway: the name is used in more parts of the file, so please change
> it everywhere if you change it.

It's only used for a few debug prints AFAICT?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120530/dc26ede7/attachment.sig>