Subject: [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflect Device Tree

From: [email-masked] (Mark Brown)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 13:15:47 +0100

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 07:40:49PM +0800, Lee Jones wrote:
> On May 30, 2012 6:03 PM, "Mark Brown" <[email-masked]>

> > If we are changing the names then not including the ab8500 bit would
> > seem more idiomatic - we've already worked out which chip this is by the
> > time we're looking here.

> No, Linus had the wrong end of the stick. I've just spoken to him in person.

> Those are not the names of the regulators. They're the names of the Device
> Tree nodes. The regulator names shall remain the same.

Fair enough.  My point about the ab8500_ bit still stands though.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120530/b62cd32e/attachment.sig>