Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: handle additional timings

From: [email-masked] (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 05:42:15 -0700

* Mohammed, Afzal <[email-masked]> [120613 05:43]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:02:17, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Mohammed, Afzal <[email-masked]> [120612 22:00]:
> > > Yes, that would be better except for too much logging, if Tony
> > > prefers that way I will add. 
> > 
> > If there's a chance it causing file system corruption, we should
> > test it carefully on the boards before applying. If that's done,
> > then there's probably no need for warnings. It's safer to disable
> > NAND for untested boards if there's a chance of breaking the timings.
> 
> By disabling NAND, I understand that you are suggesting to remove
> nand initialization done in board file, right ?

Yes, but before we do that, let's fix things first for cases that we
can test, like tusb6010 DMA.
 
> And boards that can be tested here are omap3evm & beagleboard,
> both of which can't be tested for this change.
> 
> Or should additional timings be achieved without affecting old
> interface, but that it seems would necessitate more code
> duplication.

We should just keep the same timings as before, with values
added for the newly added registers.

Regards,

Tony