Subject: [PATCH 2/2] MXS: Implement DMA support into mxs-i2c

From: [email-masked] (Marek Vasut)
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:30:16 +0200

Dear Dong Aisheng,

> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 04:24:03PM +0800, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > This patch implements DMA support into mxs-i2c. DMA transfers are now
> > enabled via DT. The DMA operation is enabled by default.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Detlev Zundel <[email-masked]>
> > CC: Dong Aisheng <[email-masked]>
> > CC: Fabio Estevam <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Linux ARM kernel <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: linux-i2c at vger.kernel.org
> > CC: Sascha Hauer <[email-masked]>
> > CC: Shawn Guo <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Stefano Babic <[email-masked]>
> > CC: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Wolfgang Denk <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Wolfram Sang <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mxs.txt |    4 +
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi                      |    2 +
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mxs.c                      |  267
> >  +++++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 22
> >  deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mxs.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mxs.txt index
> > d2bf750..9497ee0 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mxs.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mxs.txt
> > 
> > @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Required properties:
> >  - reg: Should contain registers location and length
> >  - interrupts: Should contain ERROR and DMA interrupts
> >  - clock-frequency: desired I2C bus clock frequency in Hz.
> > 
> > +- fsl,i2c-dma-channel: APBX DMA channel for the I2C
> 
> Shoundn't this be optional?

DMA channel? No, why?

> 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The last descriptor must have this callback,
> > +	 * to finish the DMA transaction.
> > +	 */
> > +	desc->callback = mxs_i2c_dma_irq_callback;
> > +	desc->callback_param = i2c;
> > +
> > +	/* Start the transfer. */
> > +	dmaengine_submit(desc);
> > +	dma_async_issue_pending(i2c->dmach);
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +/* Read failpath. */
> > +read_init_dma_fail:
> > +	dma_unmap_sg(i2c->dev, &i2c->sg_io[1], 1, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > +select_init_dma_fail:
> > +	dma_unmap_sg(i2c->dev, &i2c->sg_io[0], 1, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > +select_init_pio_fail:
> > +	return 1;
> 
> look strange why return 1;

Because it failed. -Esomething might be better ?

> > +
> > +
> 
> One more unnecessary line?
> 
> > +/* Write failpath. */
> > +write_init_dma_fail:
> > +	dma_unmap_sg(i2c->dev, i2c->sg_io, 2, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > +write_init_pio_fail:
> > +	return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> ..
> 
> > @@ -291,6 +459,7 @@ static int mxs_i2c_xfer_msg(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > struct i2c_msg *msg,
> > 
> >  timeout:
> >  	dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "Timeout!\n");
> > 
> > +	mxs_i2c_dma_finish(i2c);
> 
> Shared with pio?

Doesn't dma_unmap_sg() call check if the buffer is there or not? Therefore it 
shouldn't have any effect on PIO ops. But it can be indeed if-ed.

> >  	mxs_i2c_reset(i2c);
> >  	return -ETIMEDOUT;
> >  }
> Regards
> Dong Aisheng

Best regards,
Marek Vasut