From: arnd@arndb•de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:54:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207121554.03240.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120712131231.GH2194@pengutronix.de>
On Thursday 12 July 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> > Please check this and talk to each other ...
>
> I also noticed the bindings today [1]. They came in via a seperate
> patch (suboptimal) which has no ack by a devicetree maintainer which I'd
> really like to see here, because the bindings look suspicious to me.
> They look like they mostly export register settings which is usually
> questionable since we might want to abstract bindings so they can be
> useful for a number of drivers.
>
> Arnd, since you committed the patches, can you please comment? I'd
> prefer to drop this DT conversion for now, otherwise we might have to
> support this possibly rushed bindings forever? LinusW, what do you
> think?
I've dropped the ux500/dt branch for now. and will wait for a new one
to get submitted as a replacement. There were other things wrong with
the submission that Lee already knows about, so I think it's better
to do this the proper way now.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-10 6:41 linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 6:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 8:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 13:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-07-13 11:03 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-14 21:34 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 10:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 11:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 13:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 13:55 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:06 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 13:30 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:02 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 14:22 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:52 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 15:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 5:33 ` Shawn Guo
2012-07-18 9:59 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 10:33 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:43 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 7:35 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 11:12 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 11:24 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 11:37 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 12:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 19:45 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 20:04 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-17 13:10 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-19 5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13 6:41 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13 7:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-11-15 5:27 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201207121554.03240.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox