Subject: Device tree binding for DVFS table

From: [email-masked] (Mark Brown)
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:40:34 +0100

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:00:14AM +0530, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Thursday 12 July 2012 09:38 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:

> >About repeating frequencies, operating voltage for a frequency
> >would be the highest one mapped in the table.

This sounds very surprising...  that would generally just result in
higher power consumption.

> >I know this makes reading difficult but it provides flexibility,

> Does this explanation help?

The loss of comprehensibility seems like a really major disadvantage for
very little practical gain here.  Big arrays in DT are already hard
enough to read without adding extra complexity on top of that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120715/d6dbc57c/attachment.sig>