Subject: [PATCH 1/1] pinctrl: at91: fix typo on PULL_UP

From: [email-masked] (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:20:32 +0200

On 09:45 Wed 24 Oct     , Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Ludovic Desroches <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > index c87c2c5..0757e94 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static struct at91_gpio_chip *gpio_chips[MAX_GPIO_BANKS];
> >
> >  static int gpio_banks;
> >
> > -#define PULL_UP                (0 << 1)
> > +#define PULL_UP                (1 << 0)
> 
> Makes perfect sense. Shall I just apply this to the at91 branch too?
yeah but can the at91 is for 3.7? or 3.8?

Best Regards,
J.
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij