public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb•de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm: mvebu: Add hardware I/O Coherency support
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:24:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201210241224.06791.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5087D6B8.10209@free-electrons.com>

On Wednesday 24 October 2012, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 01:48 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > On 10/24/2012 01:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>
> >> I think it would be cleaner to statically define the operations in a constant
> >> structure and point directly to the functions you need. If necessary, use
> >> multiple structures.
> > 
> > My problem was that these functions are not exposed, only arm_dma_op and
> > arm_coherent_dma_ops are exported.
> > Or do you think about something like this:
>
> struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops = {
>         .alloc                  = arm_coherent_dma_ops.arm_coherent_dma_alloc,
>         .free                   = arm_coherent_dma_ops.arm_coherent_dma_free,
>         .mmap                   = arm_coherent_dma_ops.arm_dma_mmap,
>         .get_sgtable            = arm_coherent_dma_ops.arm_dma_get_sgtable,
>         .map_sg                 = arm_coherent_dma_ops.arm_dma_map_sg,
>         .set_dma_mask           = arm_coherent_dma_ops.arm_dma_set_mask,
>         .map_page               = armada_xp_dma_map_page,
>         .unmap_page             = armada_xp_dma_unmap_page,
>         .unmap_sg               = arm_dma_ops.unmap_sg,
>         .sync_single_for_cpu    = armada_xp_dma_sync,
>         .sync_single_for_device = armada_xp_dma_sync,
>         .sync_sg_for_cpu        = arm_dma_ops.sync_sg_for_cpu,
>         .sync_sg_for_device     = arm_dma_ops.sync_sg_for_device,
> };

No, I was thinking of making the underlying functions globally visible
and have extern declarations in a header file so you can access them
directly.

Generally speaking, when you run into a problem with common code, your
first approach should be to fix the common code before you try to work
around it.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-24 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-24  8:03 [PATCH 0/2] Add hardware I/O coherency support for Armada 370/XP Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24  8:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm: plat-orion: Add coherency attribute when setup mbus target Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 11:55   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-24  8:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm: mvebu: Add hardware I/O Coherency support Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24  8:11   ` Yehuda Yitschak
2012-10-24  8:13     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24  8:25   ` Andrew Lunn
2012-10-24 11:50     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 11:36   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24 11:48     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 11:53       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 12:24         ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-10-24 13:56           ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 20:30             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24 12:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-24 14:39     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 14:56       ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201210241224.06791.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox