Subject: [PATCH 5/6] ARM i.MX: rename ssi1 clock for imx27

From: [email-masked] (Mark Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:58:26 +0000

On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:00:24PM +0100, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <[email-masked]>

You don't say anything about why you're renaming here...

> -	clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi1_ipg_gate], NULL, "imx-ssi.0");
> +	clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi1_ipg_gate], NULL, "10010000.ssi");
>  	clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi2_ipg_gate], NULL, "imx-ssi.1");

I'm guessing this is for DT...  why are we only renaming one of the
clocks here and will this not break non-DT users?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121109/ec93c81b/attachment.sig>