Subject: OMAP* Latest build failures

From: [email-masked] (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:57:33 -0800

* Russell King - ARM Linux <[email-masked]> [121117 01:35]:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:26:43AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > OMAP* allnoconfig fails:
> > 
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_dss_set_min_bus_tput':
> > twl-common.c:(.text+0x1e08): undefined reference to `omap_pm_set_min_bus_tput'
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_hwmod_init_postsetup':
> > twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x8f8): undefined reference to `omap_pm_if_early_init'
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_serial_init_port':
> > twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1284): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count'
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_timer_init':
> > twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1544): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count'
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_common_pm_init':
> > twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1af0): undefined reference to `omap_pm_if_init'
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_gpio_dev_init':
> > twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x2168): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count'
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_display_init':
> > twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x25cc): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count'
> 
> These are now gone, but we have a new warning:
> 
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c:163:28: warning: 'omap_counter_match' defined but not used

Jon, care to fix this one?
 
> And the randconfig found:
> 
> drivers/staging/omap-thermal/omap-bandgap.c: In function 'omap_bandgap_readl':
> drivers/staging/omap-thermal/omap-bandgap.c:46:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'readl'
> drivers/staging/omap-thermal/omap-bandgap.c: In function 'omap_bandgap_writel':
> drivers/staging/omap-thermal/omap-bandgap.c:51:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'writel'
> 
> Which, as its in staging, maybe its not important but it's another source
> of unnecessary failure.

Radhesh & Eduardo, can you fix this?

Regards,

Tony