Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] irqchip: gic: Perform the gic_secondary_init() call via CPU notifier

From: [email-masked] (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:12:08 +0000

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:35:46PM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> 
> > All the calls to gic_secondary_init() pass 0 as the first argument.
> > Since this function is called on each CPU when starting, it can be done
> > in a platform-independent way via a CPU notifier registered by the GIC
> > code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email-masked]>
> > Acked-by: Stephen Warren <[email-masked]>
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email-masked]>
> > Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email-masked]>
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email-masked]>
> > Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email-masked]>
> > Tested-by: Simon Horman <[email-masked]>
> > Acked-by: Srinidhi Kasagar <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Russell King <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: David Brown <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Bryan Huntsman <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Magnus Damm <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Dinh Nguyen <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Shiraz Hashim <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <[email-masked]>
> 
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <[email-masked]>

Thanks.

> What is your plan in terms of merge path and schedule?  My mcpm series
> would depend on this.

I would like to get them in as soon as possible (ideally 3.9) as AArch64
needs GIC support. I can base them on Rob's branch (already in -next)
and send them the same route (the arm-soc tree if Olof/Arnd are ok to
take them).

-- 
Catalin