Subject: [PATCH 01/35] mfd: ab8500-gpadc: Implemented suspend/resume

From: [email-masked] (Mark Brown)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:51:24 +0000

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:27:36AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 22 February 2013 11:38, Mark Brown

> > Are you sure this actually does what you think it does, especially when
> > run on modern kernels?

> Not sure, what you are thinking of more precisely here. Runtime pm has
> been in the kernel for quite some time now.

Yes, thanks - I was aware of that.  The integration between runtime and
system PM has been an area that's had some development though.

> Anyway, to make it a bit clearer, we switch the regulator on/off at
> the runtime suspend/resume callbacks. We want to take similar actions
> in device suspend/resume.
> To accomplish this a pm_runtime_get_sync is done in suspend and vice
> verse in resume, otherwise you can not safely handle the regulator.

Are you absolutely positive that with modern kernels your get actually
resumes the device?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130225/9527c3a7/attachment.sig>