Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] pcmcia: at91_cf: clean up and add DT support

From: [email-masked] (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:54:48 -0700

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 04/17/2013 10:39 AM, Fabio Porcedda :
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Nicolas Ferre <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >> These patches clean up at91_cf a bit and add DT bindings.
> >> It is based on a previous series from Joachim Eastwood and other cleanup
> >> patches by Fabio and Laurent.
> >> I have collected them together as they are lying around for some time.
> >>
> >> Please tell me if It can go through PCMCIA tree or if Andrew or Greg can
> >> take them.
> >> Note that they are not bug fixes, so you can stack them for 3.10.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your help, best regards.
> >>
> >> v2: add 2 more cleanup patches:
> >>         - move to module_platform_driver_probe()
> >>         - little trivial indentation fix
> >>
> >> Fabio Porcedda (1):
> >>   pcmcia: at91_cf: use module_platform_driver_probe()
> >>
> >> Joachim Eastwood (5):
> >>   pcmcia: at91_cf: fix gpio_get_value in at91_cf_get_status
> >>   pcmcia: at91_cf: convert to dev_ print functions
> >>   pcmcia: at91_cf: use devm_ functions for allocations
> >>   pcmcia: at91_cf: clean up header includes
> >>   pcmcia: at91_cf: add support for DT
> >>
> >> Laurent Navet (1):
> >>   pcmcia/trivial: at91_cf: fix checkpatch error
> >>
> >>  .../devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt      |  19 +++
> >>  drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig                             |   2 +-
> >>  drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c                           | 176 ++++++++++-----------
> >>  3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.8.0
> >>
> > 
> > Ping?
> 
> Andrew, Greg, can you please take this series?
> 
> Here is the post on lkml:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/21/246
> 
> Here is the first patch in patchwork (1/7):
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2312691/
> 
> Tell me if I can do something else to make this applied upstream...

The PCMCIA maintainer should take these, not me.

thanks,

greg k-h