public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: catalin.marinas@arm•com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/2] ARM: Handle user space mapped pages in flush_kernel_dcache_page
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 16:28:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130508152819.GJ2703@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130505222645.GA1433@schnuecks.de>

On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:26:47PM +0100, Simon Baatz wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:02:42AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 08:38:36PM +0100, Simon Baatz wrote:
> ...
> > I haven't run the tests but I can see  why it fails without
> > flush_kernel_dcache_page(). So I think this function needs to be
> > implemented for aliasing VIPT or VIVT caches.
> > 
> > > It is even needed in flush_dcache_page() as long as everybody
> > > continues to use flush_dcache_page() instead of
> > > flush_kernel_dcache_page() when appropriate...
> > > (This is probably the main reason why the problem I reported is so
> > > uncommon: Everybody seems to use flush_dcache_page() and since it
> > > flushes the kernel mapping in these cases, everything is fine.)
> > 
> > That's why for non-aliasing VIPT we could make it just a clear_bit() and
> > let the callers fix their API usage.
> 
> Do you mean the unnecessary flush for anon pages or also the D/I
> flush for user space mapped page cache pages?

flush_dcache_page() should just ignore anonymous pages. The D/I
coherency would be handled in __sync_icache_dcache() later. Do we have
cases where a page is already mapped in user space (pte valid) and the
kernel writes any code to it? I don't think we have. PowerPC have a
simplified flush_dcache_page() and they haven't seen any issues.

> For anon pages, that was the content of the patch you acked ([1])
> once.  However, Russel did not like the idea to use the
> PG_dcache_clean bit also for anon pages.

I think Russell was right, the kernel does not have any guarantees about
the PG_arch_1 bit on anonymous pages. Do we could remove the !mapping
code path in flush_dcache_page().

> I have a newer version that does the following: Do nothing for
> mapping == NULL on non-aliasing VIPT in flush_dcache_page().  

Can this mapping == NULL be generalised for aliasing caches?

> In __sync_icache_dcache() flush if mapping == NULL (always on aliasing
> VIPT, only if pte_exec() on non-aliasing VIPT).

If the page is anonymous, do we expect user code to execute from a
clear page? When the page is first allocated, clear_user_highpage should
take care of the aliases already.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-08 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-07 11:29 [PATCH V2 0/2] fix and improvement of flush(_kernel)_dcache_page() Simon Baatz
2012-10-07 11:29 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] ARM: remove unnecessary flush of anon pages in flush_dcache_page() Simon Baatz
2012-10-08 11:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-08 17:38     ` Simon Baatz
2012-10-08 17:43       ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-07 11:29 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] ARM: Handle user space mapped pages in flush_kernel_dcache_page Simon Baatz
2012-10-08 17:44   ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-08 20:02     ` Simon Baatz
2012-10-08 20:20       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-08 23:07         ` Simon Baatz
2012-11-18 21:10           ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-18 11:16             ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-18 11:22               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 11:40                 ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-18 13:51                   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-04-21 22:06                     ` Simon Baatz
2013-04-30 11:22                       ` Catalin Marinas
2013-04-30 21:04                         ` Simon Baatz
2013-05-01 14:22                           ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-01 19:04                             ` Simon Baatz
2013-05-02  9:54                               ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-02 19:38                                 ` Simon Baatz
2013-05-03 10:02                                   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-04  8:21                                     ` Ming Lei
2013-05-08 15:08                                       ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-08 18:43                                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-08 19:31                                           ` Simon Baatz
2013-05-08 21:13                                             ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-09  1:52                                         ` Ming Lei
2013-05-11  6:27                                       ` Simon Baatz
2013-05-13  3:12                                         ` Ming Lei
2013-05-05 22:26                                     ` Simon Baatz
2013-05-08 15:28                                       ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-04-18 19:39                   ` Simon Baatz
2013-04-18 19:00                 ` Simon Baatz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130508152819.GJ2703@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox