Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: dfbmcs320: make the driver common for other BT modules

From: [email-masked] (Mark Brown)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 18:35:59 +0100

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:00:17PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:

> i did think it is a good idea to have device id list while i sent the
> last mail. and it matches with the generic device driver engineering
> sense. the problem is i don't how long the list will be.
> if you like to keep dfbmcs320 at least for the moment, i would agree.

I'd prefer to see the ID list; we shouldn't be throwing away
information.  Probably we can go a long way towards cutting down the
length of the list if it gets silly with use of wildcards in the device
names listed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130516/b49bd1d4/attachment.sig>