public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: catalin.marinas@arm•com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Single zImage and A15/LPAE
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:15:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130529151555.GP17767@MacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2274563.opVbLLPT1p@wuerfel>

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 02:01:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 May 2013 19:02:48 Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro•org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 May 2013, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > >> (+ Olof, Russell)
> > >>
> > >> Just note, I found this in my old mail-box...
> > >>
> > >> So I think, as a result, we need to support separate kernel binary for LPAE
> > >> and non-LPAE and you guys don't hold a different view about it.
> > >
> > > LPAE and non-LPAE configurations will most likely never be supported
> > > together in the same kernel binary.  The runtime cost would simply be
> > > too high to be worth it.
> > >
> > >> Current SSDK5440 and SD5v1 boards which are reference boards for EXYNOS5440
> > >> has over 4GB memory as a default and that's why I'm writing this e-mail. It
> > >> means I should keep separated kernel to support exynos5440 and other exynos
> > >> SoCs.
> > >
> > > They could all be supported together but with less than 4GB of memory.
> > 
> > Or the other way around, the other EXYNOS5 CPUs could all enable LPAE
> > even if they have less than 4GB of memory -- but not EXYNOS4, of
> > course.
> 
> The one bug I see is that it's currently possible to build a kernel
> for a Cortex-A5/A8/A9, Scorpion or PJ4 platform with LPAE enabled,
> which obviously cannot work.
> 
> I think to do this right, we need to treat ARMv7+LPAE as a separate
> architecture level, just like we treat ARMv6, ARMv7 as separate
> compatible architectures. BTW, is there an official name for that
> architecture?

The official is Large Physical Address Extension which is an extension
to ARMv7, so not a new architecture.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-29 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-08 23:02 Single zImage and A15/LPAE Stephen Warren
2012-10-09  2:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-10-09  7:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-09 14:17     ` Dave Martin
2013-05-29  0:28       ` Kukjin Kim
2013-05-29  1:54         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-05-29  2:02           ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-29  2:04             ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-29 13:01             ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-29 15:15               ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-05-29 21:51                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-30 16:56                   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-07-16  4:01                   ` Kukjin Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130529151555.GP17767@MacBook-Pro.local \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox