Subject: [PATCH, re-send] Always trap on BUG()

From: [email-masked] (Ingo Molnar)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:05:02 +0200

* Chen Gang <[email-masked]> wrote:

> On 07/23/2013 05:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > (the crazies can keep a separate patch to remove even more of BUG() to win 
> > a K or two.)
> > 
> 
> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand your
> meaning, could you please repeat again in details or say more clearly ?

I meant: those people who'd like to have the tiny 
additional space savings offered by !CONFIG_BUG (and are 
crazy enough to live with non-determinism in exchange for a 
measly payment of 1 KB), can apply a separate, out of tree 
patch just fine and don't need upstream kernel support.

Thanks,

	Ingo