Subject: [PATCH 1/4] clk: sunxi: Rename the structure to prepare the addition of sun6i

From: [email-masked] (Maxime Ripard)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:20:43 +0200

Hi Emilio,

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:14:14PM -0300, Emilio L?pez wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> El 30/07/13 11:44, Maxime Ripard escribi?:
> > Rename all the generic-named structure to sun4i to avoid confusion when
> > we will introduce the sun6i (A31) clocks.
> > 
> > While we're at it, avoid too long lines and wrap the DT compatibles
> > tables.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email-masked]>
> 
> Overall the patch looks good :)
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> > index fe1528e..3c91888 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> > @@ -25,12 +25,12 @@
> >  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clk_lock);
> >  
> >  /**
> > - * sunxi_osc_clk_setup() - Setup function for gatable oscillator
> > + * sun4i_osc_clk_setup() - Setup function for gatable oscillator
> >   */
> >  
> >  #define SUNXI_OSC24M_GATE	0
> >  
> > -static void __init sunxi_osc_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
> > +static void __init sun4i_osc_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
> >  {
> >  	struct clk *clk;
> >  	struct clk_fixed_rate *fixed;
> > @@ -73,13 +73,13 @@ static void __init sunxi_osc_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
> >  
> >  
> >  /**
> > - * sunxi_get_pll1_factors() - calculates n, k, m, p factors for PLL1
> > + * sun4i_get_pll1_factors() - calculates n, k, m, p factors for PLL1
> >   * PLL1 rate is calculated as follows
> >   * rate = (parent_rate * n * (k + 1) >> p) / (m + 1);
> >   * parent_rate is always 24Mhz
> >   */
> >  
> > -static void sunxi_get_pll1_factors(u32 *freq, u32 parent_rate,
> > +static void sun4i_get_pll1_factors(u32 *freq, u32 parent_rate,
> >  				   u8 *n, u8 *k, u8 *m, u8 *p)
> >  {
> >  	u8 div;
> > @@ -127,12 +127,12 @@ static void sunxi_get_pll1_factors(u32 *freq, u32 parent_rate,
> >  
> >  
> >  /**
> > - * sunxi_get_apb1_factors() - calculates m, p factors for APB1
> > + * sun4i_get_apb1_factors() - calculates m, p factors for APB1
> >   * APB1 rate is calculated as follows
> >   * rate = (parent_rate >> p) / (m + 1);
> >   */
> >  
> > -static void sunxi_get_apb1_factors(u32 *freq, u32 parent_rate,
> > +static void sun4i_get_apb1_factors(u32 *freq, u32 parent_rate,
> >  				   u8 *n, u8 *k, u8 *m, u8 *p)
> >  {
> >  	u8 calcm, calcp;
> > @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ struct factors_data {
> >  	void (*getter) (u32 *rate, u32 parent_rate, u8 *n, u8 *k, u8 *m, u8 *p);
> >  };
> >  
> > -static struct clk_factors_config pll1_config = {
> > +static struct clk_factors_config sun4i_pll1_config = {
> >  	.nshift = 8,
> >  	.nwidth = 5,
> >  	.kshift = 4,
> > @@ -189,21 +189,21 @@ static struct clk_factors_config pll1_config = {
> >  	.pwidth = 2,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static struct clk_factors_config apb1_config = {
> > +static struct clk_factors_config sun4i_apb1_config = {
> >  	.mshift = 0,
> >  	.mwidth = 5,
> >  	.pshift = 16,
> >  	.pwidth = 2,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static const __initconst struct factors_data pll1_data = {
> > -	.table = &pll1_config,
> > -	.getter = sunxi_get_pll1_factors,
> > +static const __initconst struct factors_data sun4i_pll1_data = {
> > +	.table = &sun4i_pll1_config,
> > +	.getter = sun4i_get_pll1_factors,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static const __initconst struct factors_data apb1_data = {
> > -	.table = &apb1_config,
> > -	.getter = sunxi_get_apb1_factors,
> > +static const __initconst struct factors_data sun4i_apb1_data = {
> > +	.table = &sun4i_apb1_config,
> > +	.getter = sun4i_get_apb1_factors,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static void __init sunxi_factors_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
> > @@ -239,11 +239,11 @@ struct mux_data {
> >  	u8 shift;
> >  };
> >  
> > -static const __initconst struct mux_data cpu_mux_data = {
> > +static const __initconst struct mux_data sun4i_cpu_mux_data = {
> >  	.shift = 16,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static const __initconst struct mux_data apb1_mux_data = {
> > +static const __initconst struct mux_data sun4i_apb1_mux_data = {
> >  	.shift = 24,
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -284,17 +284,17 @@ struct div_data {
> >  	u8 pow;
> >  };
> >  
> > -static const __initconst struct div_data axi_data = {
> > +static const __initconst struct div_data sun4i_axi_data = {
> >  	.shift = 0,
> >  	.pow = 0,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static const __initconst struct div_data ahb_data = {
> > +static const __initconst struct div_data sun4i_ahb_data = {
> >  	.shift = 4,
> >  	.pow = 1,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static const __initconst struct div_data apb0_data = {
> > +static const __initconst struct div_data sun4i_apb0_data = {
> >  	.shift = 8,
> >  	.pow = 1,
> >  };
> > @@ -413,35 +413,77 @@ CLK_OF_DECLARE(sunxi_osc, "allwinner,sun4i-osc-clk", sunxi_osc_clk_setup);
> >  
> >  /* Matches for factors clocks */
> >  static const __initconst struct of_device_id clk_factors_match[] = {
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-pll1-clk", .data = &pll1_data,},
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-apb1-clk", .data = &apb1_data,},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-pll1-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_pll1_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-apb1-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_apb1_data,
> > +	},
> >  	{}
> >  };
> >  
> >  /* Matches for divider clocks */
> >  static const __initconst struct of_device_id clk_div_match[] = {
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-axi-clk", .data = &axi_data,},
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-ahb-clk", .data = &ahb_data,},
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-apb0-clk", .data = &apb0_data,},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-axi-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_axi_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-ahb-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_ahb_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-apb0-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_apb0_data,
> > +	},
> >  	{}
> >  };
> >  
> >  /* Matches for mux clocks */
> >  static const __initconst struct of_device_id clk_mux_match[] = {
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-cpu-clk", .data = &cpu_mux_data,},
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-apb1-mux-clk", .data = &apb1_mux_data,},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-cpu-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_cpu_mux_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-apb1-mux-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_apb1_mux_data,
> > +	},
> >  	{}
> >  };
> >  
> >  /* Matches for gate clocks */
> >  static const __initconst struct of_device_id clk_gates_match[] = {
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-axi-gates-clk", .data = &sun4i_axi_gates_data,},
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-ahb-gates-clk", .data = &sun4i_ahb_gates_data,},
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-ahb-gates-clk", .data = &sun5i_a13_ahb_gates_data,},
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-apb0-gates-clk", .data = &sun4i_apb0_gates_data,},
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-apb0-gates-clk", .data = &sun5i_a13_apb0_gates_data,},
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-apb1-gates-clk", .data = &sun4i_apb1_gates_data,},
> > -	{.compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-apb1-gates-clk", .data = &sun5i_a13_apb1_gates_data,},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-axi-gates-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_axi_gates_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-ahb-gates-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_ahb_gates_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-ahb-gates-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun5i_a13_ahb_gates_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-apb0-gates-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_apb0_gates_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-apb0-gates-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun5i_a13_apb0_gates_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-apb1-gates-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun4i_apb1_gates_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-apb1-gates-clk",
> > +		.data = &sun5i_a13_apb1_gates_data,
> > +	},
> >  	{}
> >  };
> >  
> 
> I'm not particularly a fan of this though; in my opinion it hurts
> readability a bit and it uses 4x the lines. It looks like a highly
> probable source of git conflicts too if not handled appropriately :)

Yeah, I'll drop it just like for pinctrl then.

> 
> Other than that,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Emilio L?pez <[email-masked]>

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130731/a9a2f6a8/attachment-0001.sig>