Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 43/51] DMA-API: dma: edma.c: no need to explicitly initialize DMA masks

From: [email-masked] (Vinod Koul)
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:55:33 +0530

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:15:39AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> register_platform_device_full() can setup the DMA mask provided the
> appropriate member is set in struct platform_device_info.  So lets
> make that be the case.  This avoids a direct reference to the DMA
> masks by this driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email-masked]>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <[email-masked]>

This also brings me question that should we force the driver to use the
dma_set_mask_and_coherent() API or they have below flexiblity too?

~Vinod

> ---
>  drivers/dma/edma.c |    6 ++----
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
> index ff50ff4..7f9fe30 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
> @@ -702,11 +702,13 @@ static struct platform_device *pdev0, *pdev1;
>  static const struct platform_device_info edma_dev_info0 = {
>  	.name = "edma-dma-engine",
>  	.id = 0,
> +	.dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
>  };
>  
>  static const struct platform_device_info edma_dev_info1 = {
>  	.name = "edma-dma-engine",
>  	.id = 1,
> +	.dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
>  };

>  
>  static int edma_init(void)
> @@ -720,8 +722,6 @@ static int edma_init(void)
>  			ret = PTR_ERR(pdev0);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> -		pdev0->dev.dma_mask = &pdev0->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> -		pdev0->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (EDMA_CTLRS == 2) {
> @@ -731,8 +731,6 @@ static int edma_init(void)
>  			platform_device_unregister(pdev0);
>  			ret = PTR_ERR(pdev1);
>  		}
> -		pdev1->dev.dma_mask = &pdev1->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> -		pdev1->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

--