From: arnd@arndb•de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] v7-M support using MULTIPLATFORM
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:40:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201311051240.34212.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131104082513.GG14892@pengutronix.de>
On Monday 04 November 2013, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Hello Nicolas,
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:46:42PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:28:01AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > > Right, but do we agree that it should be possible to create an XIP image
> > > > for i.MX6? If so: You currently cannot, because i.MX6 isn't configurable
> > > > without MULTIPLATFORM. Also in the times before MULTIPLATFORM XIP was
> > > > special.
> > >
> > > That's one of the consequences of pushing to multiplatform support - XIP
> > > has fallen by the way side as a result of this effort (it was discussed
> > > previously) and we had decided that almost no one uses it anymore and it
> > > would not be part of the multiplatform stuff. It was only really used
> > > by very few SA11x0 and PXA platforms anyway.
> >
> > Semantically, MULTIPLATFORM is incompatible with XIP as well as NOMMU.
> >
> > So if a platform exists only when MULTIPLATFORM is selected, preventing
> > it from being configured as NOMMU or XIP then something is broken with
> > MULTIPLATFORM.
> Is this an Ack for patch 1 in this series?
Uwe, have you seen that patch that Jonathan Austin was working on to reorganize
the platform selection for multiplatform? I don't know if he has gotten around
the time to post it on the mailing list, if not he can probably follow up here.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-05 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-30 9:49 [PATCH 0/3] v7-M support using MULTIPLATFORM Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-30 9:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: drop !ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM dependency of XIP_KERNEL Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-30 9:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: allow MULTIPLATFORM on no-MMU machines Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-01 10:29 ` Jonathan Austin
2013-09-30 9:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] ARM: prepare ARMv7-M for MULTIPLATFORM use Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-30 10:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-09-30 16:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-03 20:04 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-03 22:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] v7-M support using MULTIPLATFORM Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-03 22:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-03 23:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-04 1:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-04 8:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-11-05 11:40 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-10-04 7:31 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201311051240.34212.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox