Subject: [PATCH v3 9/9] ARM: dts: add usb udc support to bcm281xx

From: [email-masked] (Matt Porter)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:24:58 -0500

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:27:19PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Monday 25 November 2013 11:46 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> > Adds USB OTG/PHY and clock support to BCM281xx and enables
> > UDC support on the bcm11351-brt and bcm28155-ap boards.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <[email-masked]>
> > Reviewed-by: Markus Mayer <[email-masked]>
> > Reviewed-by: Tim Kryger <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts |  6 ++++++
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351.dtsi    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm28155-ap.dts  |  8 ++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts
> > index 23cd16d..396b704 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts
> > @@ -44,5 +44,11 @@
> >  		status = "okay";
> >  	};
> >  
> > +	usbotg: usb at 3f120000 {
> > +		status = "okay";
> > +	};
> 
> using &usbotg could have been better. I mean if you have something like
> &usbotg, you realise that the node has been created somewhere and we are just
> referencing it here to add more properties.

That's normally my preference, but Christian owns this file and doesn't
like that syntax. Instead, I'm conforming with the rest of the .dts
entries. He and I discussed moving to &label references a while back and
that's a no go.

Thanks,
Matt