Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: tegra: Add efuse bindings

From: [email-masked] (Thierry Reding)
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 21:05:05 +0100

On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:50:35AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/08/2014 06:39 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:40:51PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 12/24/2013 06:32 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > [...]
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi
> >>
> >>> +	efuse at 7000F800 {
> >>
> >> "fuse" might be a better node name; "efuse" is presumably the name of
> >> the instance, not the type of object.
> > 
> > There's another occurrence I noticed recently where we haven't followed
> > that rule. The PMIC node on Venice2 for instance is called as3722.
> > Perhaps that should also be renamed.
> 
> Yes, we should fix that. Care to send a patch?

Will do.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140108/876abd9e/attachment.sig>