public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: peterz@infradead•org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] idle: move the cpuidle entry point to the generic idle loop
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:06:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140130180659.GI5002@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52EA8BD4.6020803@linaro.org>

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 06:28:52PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Ok, I think the mess is coming from 'default_idle' which does not re-enable
> the local_irq but used from different places like amd_e400_idle and
> apm_cpu_idle.
> 
> void default_idle(void)
> {
>         trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(1, smp_processor_id());
>         safe_halt();
>         trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id());
> }
> 
> Considering the system configured without cpuidle because this one *always*
> enable the local irq, we have the different cases:
> 
> x86_idle = default_idle();
> ==> local_irq_enable is missing
> 

safe_halt() is "sti; hlt" and so very much does the irq_enable.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-30 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-29 17:45 [PATCH v2 0/6] setting the table for integration of cpuidle with the scheduler Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-29 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] idle: move the cpuidle entry point to the generic idle loop Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-29 20:31   ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-30  3:38     ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-30  5:28       ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-30  5:50         ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-30 13:44         ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 16:07           ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-30 17:28             ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 18:06               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-01-30 19:24               ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-29 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ARM: remove redundant cpuidle_idle_call() Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-29 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] PPC: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-29 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] SH: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-29 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] X86: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-29 19:02   ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-29 20:14     ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-30  9:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-29 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] cpu/idle.c: move to sched/idle.c Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-30 15:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 16:03     ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-30 16:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 16:41         ` Joe Perches
2014-01-30 16:52           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-06 14:09         ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-06 16:43           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-07 11:09             ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-07 12:32               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30  9:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] setting the table for integration of cpuidle with the scheduler Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 13:31   ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140130180659.GI5002@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox