public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: andrew@lunn•ch (Andrew Lunn)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: MVEBU: Use Device ID and revision from underlying endpoint
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 17:54:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140205165432.GD29860@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140205172110.22507687@skate>

> > @@ -388,7 +380,8 @@ static void mvebu_sw_pci_bridge_init(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
> >  
> >  	bridge->class = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI;
> >  	bridge->vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL;
> 
> This could also have been replaced by:
> 
> 	bridge->vendor = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_DEV_ID_OFF) & 0xff;

O.K, but do we ever expect it not to be PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL on the
underlying hardware?

> 
> > -	bridge->device = MARVELL_EMULATED_PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_ID;
> > +	bridge->device = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_DEV_ID_OFF) >> 16;
> > +	bridge->revision = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_DEV_REV_OFF) & 0xff;
> 
> On Armada 370 and XP, this field is apparently always 0x0, so not very
> useful. But if it's useful on other mvebu SoCs, that's fine, it's just
> an informative field anyway.

Humm, that should be the stepping, unless i have made a mistake. The
code Gregory wrote for mvebu-soc-id.c does:

       /* SoC ID */
        soc_dev_id = readl(pci_base + PCIE_DEV_ID_OFF) >> 16;

        /* SoC revision */
        soc_rev = readl(pci_base + PCIE_DEV_REV_OFF) & SOC_REV_MASK;

However, the box i'm testing on has stepping 0, so it is hard to test.
Could you test this in an OpenBlocks AX3 B0, or some other B0 device?

Thanks
	Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-05 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-05 10:55 [PATCH] PCI: MVEBU: Use Device ID and revision from underlying endpoint Andrew Lunn
2014-02-05 16:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-05 16:54   ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2014-02-05 17:03     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-05 18:42 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-12 21:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140205165432.GD29860@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn$(echo .)ch \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox