Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: DRA7: Add support for soc_is_dra74x() and soc_is_dra72x() varients

From: [email-masked] (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 09:28:01 -0700

* Rajendra Nayak <[email-masked]> [140429 04:22]:
> On Tuesday 29 April 2014 04:48 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 April 2014 16:35:13 Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> >> @@ -393,7 +395,12 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)
> >>  
> >>  #if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX)
> >>  #undef soc_is_dra7xx
> >> +#undef soc_is_dra74x
> >> +#undef soc_is_dra72x
> >>  #define soc_is_dra7xx()        (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra7"))
> >> +#define soc_is_dra74x()        (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra74"))
> >> +#define soc_is_dra72x()        (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra72"))
> >> +
> > 
> > You shouldn't normally have to define these. Why are they needed?
> > 
> > Maybe it's better to wait for a user to show up, and then we can decide
> > whether we actually want to have them this way, or if there is a better
> > solution for the particular use case.
> > 
> > Normally, we'd want to make run-time decisions based on properties
> > of the nodes a driver is working on, not the global machine compatible
> > string.
> 
> Yeah, actually this can be dropped. There is no user for it now.

OK applying all but the last patch into omap-for-v3.16/dt branch,
it seems there's no need to separate out the fixes in this case.

Regards,

Tony