Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: bcm590xx: add support for secondary I2C slave address

From: [email-masked] (Matt Porter)
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 16:29:23 -0400

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:00:55PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 05:11:31PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/bcm590xx.c       | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > > > >  include/linux/mfd/bcm590xx.h |  9 ++++---
> > > > >  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> > > There's cross-deps so the regulator driver will need to go with it.
> > > Mark mentioned earlier in the thread that he wanted to merge through
> > > the regulator tree though.
> 
> > Still nothing.
> 
> > Mark,
> >   Can I apply this set and supply you with a pull-request?
> 
> Can someone please send me whatever it is you want me to look at, the
> above diffstat doesn't look relevant.  Given the frequency of respins
> I'm not always paying a huge amount of attention to MFD serieses which
> look like they're going to be resent.

Just resent the v2 series.

-Matt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140520/77789b23/attachment.sig>