public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: catalin.marinas@arm•com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/24] ARM64: Introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread. Use them in the correct locations.
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:47:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618174710.GB11977@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400914939-9708-11-git-send-email-apinski@cavium.com>

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:02:05AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> index e71f81f..fad7612 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> @@ -293,28 +293,47 @@ struct compat_shmid64_ds {
>  	compat_ulong_t __unused5;
>  };
>  
> -static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
>  {
>  	return test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT);
>  }
> -
> -static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
>  {
>  	return test_ti_thread_flag(thread, TIF_32BIT);
>  }
> +#else
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
>  
>  #else /* !CONFIG_COMPAT */
>  
> -static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -
> -static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }

Why do we have 2 dummy definitions for is_a32_compat_task()? Could we
not squash them into one with different #ifdefs?

>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
> +
> +static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +{
> +	return is_a32_compat_task();
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +{
> +	return is_a32_compat_thread(thread);
> +}
>  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>  #endif /* __ASM_COMPAT_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> index 36c3603..8180511 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ extern int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
>  
>  /* 1GB of VA */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> -#define STACK_RND_MASK			(test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
> +#define STACK_RND_MASK			(is_compat_task() ? \
>  						0x7ff >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 12) : \
>  						0x3ffff >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 12))

I think I tried something similar in the past and while it works most of
the time, you can easily get into an #include mess since now elf.h needs
compat.h. Similarly for other header files where you've changed this.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 720e70b..b2bf728 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void)
>  #define TIF_FREEZE		19
>  #define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK	20
>  #define TIF_SINGLESTEP		21
> -#define TIF_32BIT		22	/* 32bit process */
> +#define TIF_32BIT		22	/* AARCH32 process */

Can we not just keep TIF_32BIT for limiting the address space to 32-bit
and use another bit for AArch32 applications?

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-18 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-24  7:01 [PATCHv2 00/24] ILP32 Support in ARM64 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:01 ` [PATCH 01/24] ARM64: Force LP64 to compile the kernel Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:01 ` [PATCH 02/24] ARM64: Rename COMPAT to AARCH32_EL0 in Kconfig Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:01 ` [PATCH 03/24] ARM64: Change some CONFIG_COMPAT over to use CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0 instead Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:15   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:01 ` [PATCH 04/24] ARM64:ILP32: Set kernel_long to long long so we can reuse most of the same syscalls as LP64 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 05/24] ARM64:UAPI: Set the correct __BITS_PER_LONG for ILP32 Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:22   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 15:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 06/24] Allow for some signal structures to be the same between a 32bit ABI and the 64bit ABI Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 07/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use the same size and layout of the signal structures for ILP32 as for LP64 Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:58   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 08/24] Allow a 32bit ABI to use the naming of the 64bit ABI syscalls to avoid confusion of not splitting the registers Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 16:22   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 09/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use the same syscall names as LP64 Andrew Pinski
2014-06-18  8:51   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 10/24] ARM64: Introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread. Use them in the correct locations Andrew Pinski
2014-06-18 17:47   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 11/24] ARM64: Add ARM64_ILP32 to Kconfig Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 12/24] ARM64: Add is_ilp32_compat_task and is_ilp32_compat_thread and TIF_32BIT_AARCH64 Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:49   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 13/24] Drivers:input: Use is_compat_task for ARM64 also Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:50   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 14/24] ARM64:ILP32: COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME is true for ILP32 tasks Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:52   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 15/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use the non compat HWCAP for ILP32 Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:54   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 13:01   ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 16/24] ARM64:ILP32 use the standard start_thread for ILP32 so the processor state is not AARCH32 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 17/24] ARM64:ILP32: Support core dump for ILP32 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 18/24] ARM64: Add loading of ILP32 binaries Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 19/24] ARM64: Add vdso for ILP32 and use it for the signal return Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 20/24] ptrace: Allow compat to use the native siginfo Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 21/24] ARM64:ILP32: The native siginfo is used instead of the compat siginfo Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 18:56   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 22/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use a seperate syscall table as a few syscalls need to be using the compat syscalls Andrew Pinski
2014-07-01 15:05   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 15:30     ` Pinski, Andrew
2014-07-01 16:38       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 16:50         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 17:04           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 16:49       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 23/24] ARM64:ILP32: Fix signal return for ILP32 when the user modified the signal stack Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 24/24] Add documentation about ARM64 ILP32 ABI Andrew Pinski
2014-06-16 17:08 ` [PATCHv2 00/24] ILP32 Support in ARM64 Catalin Marinas
2014-06-16 17:19   ` Pinski, Andrew
2014-06-17 10:43     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 11:30       ` Pinski, Andrew

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140618174710.GB11977@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox