Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] phy: miphy365x: Represent each PHY channel as a subnode

From: [email-masked] (Lee Jones)
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 12:34:28 +0100

> On Monday 30 June 2014 08:11 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > phy: miphy365x: Represent each PHY channel as a DT subnode
> > 
> > This has the added advantages of being able to enable/disable each
> > of the channels as simply as enabling/disabling the DT node.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email-masked]>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email-masked]>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
> > index 1109f42..2c4ea6e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c

[...]

> > -static int miphy365x_of_probe(struct device_node *np,
> > +static int miphy365x_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >  			      struct miphy365x_dev *phy_dev)
> >  {
> > +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > +	struct device_node *child;
> > +	int child_count = 0;
> > +
> > +	for_each_child_of_node(np, child)
> > +		child_count++;
> 
> use of_get_child_count() instead.

Ah, nice. I'll do that.

[...]

> I think you can merge this to your original patch.

I can do that, but I thought It'd be nice to keep some history and
show the migration over to a different setup.  This is particularly
important for when we back-port the changes back into the internal
development kernel.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog