From: will.deacon@arm•com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: rockchip: enable support for RK3288 SoCs
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:20:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140717102045.GG21153@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=Vp2GqwEsLt5n5176ZRvDgNLSYFSUC6G+7pV6cuATuFTw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:57:21PM +0100, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Heiko,
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Heiko St?bner <heiko@sntech•de> wrote:
> > Enable HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER and add a rockchip,rk3288 compatible.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech•de>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rockchip.c | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
> > index e4564c2..d168669 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ config ARCH_ROCKCHIP
> > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> > select ARM_GIC
> > select CACHE_L2X0
> > + select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>
> Do we want to think about allowing someone to enable the A9-based
> Rockchip SoCs separately than the A12-based ones? I know it doesn't
> hurt to have the arch timer code present on A9 SoCs (it will figure
> things out at runtime), but people trying to build an A9-based system
> might not want the extra code?
More likely, people using the A12-based system won't want the CACHE_L2X0
code (which adds an outer_cache.sync check to wmb()).
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-17 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-15 22:58 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: rockchip: add initial support for rk3288 Heiko Stübner
2014-07-15 22:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: add arm, cortex-a12 cpu compatible property Heiko Stübner
2014-07-16 0:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: add arm,cortex-a12 " Olof Johansson
2014-07-16 9:03 ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-15 23:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: rockchip: add debug uart used by rk3288 Heiko Stübner
2014-07-16 4:13 ` Doug Anderson
2014-07-16 9:11 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-07-16 15:09 ` Doug Anderson
2014-07-15 23:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: Kconfig: set default gpio number for rockchip SoCs Heiko Stübner
2014-07-16 4:41 ` Doug Anderson
2014-07-15 23:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: rockchip: enable support for RK3288 SoCs Heiko Stübner
2014-07-16 19:57 ` Doug Anderson
2014-07-16 20:22 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-07-17 10:20 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-07-15 23:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: rockchip: add core rk3288 dtsi Heiko Stübner
2014-07-16 0:02 ` Doug Anderson
2014-07-16 0:55 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-16 20:04 ` Doug Anderson
2014-07-15 23:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: add rk3288 evaluation board Heiko Stübner
2014-07-16 1:00 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-16 20:02 ` Doug Anderson
2014-07-16 21:22 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-07-17 10:18 ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM: rockchip: add initial support for rk3288 Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140717102045.GG21153@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox