Subject: [PATCH v2 14/16] cpufreq: Add cpufreq driver for Tegra124

From: [email-masked] (Thierry Reding)
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:10:04 +0200

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:43:40AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 July 2014 00:47, Tuomas Tynkkynen <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > It's this:
> >
> > +static int tegra124_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > [...]
> > +
> > +       dfll_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(cpu_dev->of_node, "dfll");
> > +       if (IS_ERR(dfll_clk)) {
> > +               ret = PTR_ERR(dfll_clk);
> > +               goto out_put_cpu_clk;
> > +       }
> 
> This would search for clocks passed via DT, right? Why would we
> get EPROBE_DEFER for that? Sorry for the stupid question.

of_clk_get_by_name() can return -EPROBE_DEFER, which will happen if the
clock provider hasn't been registered yet.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140724/4ff0a233/attachment.sig>