public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lina.iyer@linaro•org (Lina Iyer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/8] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:25:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140813192533.GA32624@ilina-mac.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407945127-27554-3-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

Hi Lorenzo,

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 04:52:01PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>+===========================================
>+4 - Examples
>+===========================================
>+
>+Example 1 (ARM 64-bit, 16-cpu system, PSCI enable-method):
>+
>+cpus {
>+	#size-cells = <0>;
>+	#address-cells = <2>;
>+
>+	CPU0: cpu at 0 {
>+		device_type = "cpu";
>+		compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
>+		reg = <0x0 0x0>;
>+		enable-method = "psci";
>+		cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_RETENTION_0_0 &CPU_SLEEP_0_0
>+				   &CLUSTER_RETENTION_0 &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
>+	};
Sorry for jumping in late. I havent gone through all the patches yet or
followed on previous discussions, if somebody could answer this or point
me to the discussion, it would be great.
Why is the cpu defining the possible cluster idle states? Would it be
better that cluster states form a separate node, something like this -

	CLUSTER0: cluster at 0 {
		...
		cpus = <&CPU0 &CPU1 &CPU2 &CPU3>;
		cluster-idle-states = <&CLUTER_RETENTION_0, &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
		};
	};	
		
Allowing for something like this to be defined - 

	super_cluster0: cluster at 101 {
		...
		clusters = <&CLUSTER0  &CLUSTER1>;
		cluster-idle-states = <&SOC_RETENTION, &SOC_SLEEP>;
		};
	};

And each cluster-idle-state follows the general idle definition as
provided in this document, and an indicator what the compising
components should idle at, for this idle state to be available.

	CLUSTER_SLEEP_0: cluster-sleep at 0 {
		...
		/* sleep definition for cluster0's retention */
		min-idle-state = <CPU_SLEEP_0>;
	};

	SOC_SLEEP: cluster-sleep at 101 {
		...
		min-idle-state = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
	};
		

Opens up the idle state for a lot of heirarchical possibilities, which
if you think, is generally how the SoC is. 


Thanks,
Lina

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-13 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-13 15:51 [PATCH v7 0/8] ARM generic idle states Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-13 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] arm64: kernel: refactor the CPU suspend API for retention states Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-18  7:47   ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 14:20   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-13 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-13 19:25   ` Lina Iyer [this message]
2014-08-13 22:11     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-15 17:20   ` Lina Iyer
2014-08-15 17:51     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-18 14:20   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-13 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] drivers: cpuidle: implement DT based idle states infrastructure Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-13 16:31   ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-08-13 17:04     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-13 17:29       ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-08-14 11:29         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-14 15:47           ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-08-14 16:02             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-18 14:21           ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-13 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] arm64: kernel: introduce cpu_init_idle CPU operation Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-18 14:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-13 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] arm64: add PSCI CPU_SUSPEND based cpu_suspend support Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-18 14:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-13 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] drivers: cpuidle: CPU idle ARM64 driver Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-18 14:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-18 22:30     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-18 14:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-18 22:25     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-13 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] drivers: cpuidle: initialize big.LITTLE driver through DT Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-18 14:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-13 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] drivers: cpuidle: initialize Exynos " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-15 21:12   ` Lina Iyer
2014-08-15 21:40     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-15 21:45       ` Lina Iyer
2014-08-15 21:52         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-18 14:22   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140813192533.GA32624@ilina-mac.local \
    --to=lina.iyer@linaro$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox