Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 5/7] dma-mapping: detect and configure IOMMU in of_dma_configure

From: [email-masked] (Will Deacon)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:50:27 +0100

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:29:10AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:17:33PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 12 September 2014 17:34:53 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > This patch extends of_dma_configure so that it sets up the IOMMU for a
> > > device, as well as the coherent/non-coherent DMA mapping ops.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email-masked]>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |  4 +++-
> > >  drivers/of/platform.c              | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  include/linux/dma-mapping.h        |  8 +++++++-
> > >  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > > b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h index 7e9ac4f604c3..a8bb0c494bb3
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > > @@ -121,7 +121,9 @@ static inline unsigned long dma_max_pfn(struct device
> > > *dev) }
> > >  #define dma_max_pfn(dev) dma_max_pfn(dev)
> > > 
> > > -static inline void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, bool coherent)
> > > +static inline void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base,
> > > +				      u64 size, struct iommu_dma_mapping *iommu,
> > > +				      bool coherent)
> > >  {
> > >  	if (coherent)
> > >  		set_dma_ops(dev, &arm_coherent_dma_ops);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > index 946dd7ae0394..95ebd38db545 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of_iommu.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > @@ -166,6 +167,7 @@ static void of_dma_configure(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev) int ret;
> > >  	bool coherent;
> > >  	unsigned long offset;
> > > +	struct iommu_dma_mapping *iommu;
> > >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > 
> > >  	/*
> > > @@ -195,7 +197,19 @@ static void of_dma_configure(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev) dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sdma coherent\n",
> > >  		coherent ? " " : " not ");
> > > 
> > > -	arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, coherent);
> > > +	iommu = of_iommu_configure(dev);
> > > +	dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sbehind an iommu\n",
> > > +		iommu ? " " : " not ");
> > > +
> > > +	arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_addr, size, iommu, coherent);
> > > +
> > > +	if (iommu)
> > > +		kref_put(&iommu->kref, of_iommu_deconfigure);
> > 
> > What's the expected life cycle of the iommu_dma_mapping structure ? It gets 
> > created by of_iommu_configure() and the initial reference gets dropped here. I 
> > suppose you expect arch code to need to keep a reference to the structure, but 
> > your implementation in patch 7/7 doesn't. As far as I can see, you don't even 
> > use the contents of the structure in the ARM arch_setup_dma_ops() 
> > implementation. Do you expect that to change later, or other architectures to 
> > need it ?
> > 
> > By the way, now that I think about it, I find struct iommu_dma_mapping and 
> > struct dma_iommu_mapping very confusing.
> 
> Agreed. I wonder how useful it is to know the set of IOMMU instances
> that each device can master through. Wouldn't it be more useful to keep
> a list of master interfaces for each device? The set of IOMMU instances
> can trivially be derived from that.

I'm struggling to think how that would look. What do you mean by `master
interfaces' in terms of the code we have in Linux? At the end of the day,
the list of IOMMU instances (i.e. iommu_dma_mapping) exists because you
and Laurent have use-cases involving devices mastering through multiple
IOMMUs. If it doesn't work for you, it might be best for you to send me
the patch ;)

Will