Subject: [PATCH v3 00/12] clk: sunxi: Improve MMC clocks support

From: [email-masked] (Maxime Ripard)
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:55:07 +0200

Hi Mike,

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 05:42:18PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Maxime Ripard (2014-09-22 04:31:33)
> > Mike,
> > 
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:18:14PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > 
> > > Here is an attempt at improving the MMC clock support in the Allwinner
> > > SoCs.
> > > 
> > > Until now, the MMC clocks were having a custom phase function that was
> > > directly setting an obscure value in the right register, because we
> > > were not really having any idea of what these values were.
> > > 
> > > Now that we have more informations, we can introduce a common function
> > > call to get and set the phase of a particular clock, and use this in
> > > both our provider and our client.
> > 
> > It would be great that we have that custom phase API out of the kernel
> > for 3.18, and you were one of the greatest supporters to that idea,
> > could we please have your view on this?
> 
> Patches all look good to me. Did you want the whole series to go through
> the clk tree?

I guess it would be where it most make sense yes.

> If so we'll need an Ack for the MMC patch and for the ARM DTS
> patches as well.

We already have an Ack from Ulf on the MMC patch, and I'm the
maintainer of the DTS involved, so we should be ok :)

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140926/c3dd532a/attachment.sig>