Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM: sun7i: add support for A20-OLinuXino-Lime2

From: [email-masked] (Maxime Ripard)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:56:43 +0200

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:15:48PM +0100, Iain Paton wrote:
> On 09/10/14 20:56, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi Iain,
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:27:50AM +0100, Iain Paton wrote:
> >> This adds support for the Olimex A20-OLinuXino-Lime2
> >> https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2
> >>
> >> Differences to previous Lime boards are 1GB RAM and gigabit ethernet
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Iain Paton <[email-masked]>
> > 
> > Sorry for noticing this so late, but we sort the DT nodes by their
> > base address. Could you respin this for another version?
> 
> Sure, no problem, on it's way shortly.
> 
> Is there any general rule for this sort of thing, or is this something 
> specific to sunxi?   
> 
> Asking mainly as I've been asked to do them alphabetically previously 
> by a different maintainer and that's esentially why I did it the same 
> way here.
> 
> Everyone having different undocumented conventions seems likely to 
> become counter productive eventually.

That's unusual, it should be a global convention at least for ARM.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141010/6ff496e6/attachment-0001.sig>