Subject: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 01/10] clk: sunxi: Add module 0 (storage) style clock support for A80

From: [email-masked] (Maxime Ripard)
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 16:16:40 +0100

On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 09:13:46AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > (Which makes me wonder why do we the same spinlock for all the
> > instances of the mod0 clocks, but that's another story)
> 
> Are you worried about contention? AFAIK we don't do anything
> fancy in our code that would result in a major problem.
> I was wondering the same thing a while ago.

Yes. While I'm not overly concerned about a performance bottleneck, it
does seems a bit odd to have a shared lock when there's no shared
resources.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141207/a2295bc8/attachment.sig>