Subject: AT91 slow clock mode regression/fixes, improvement proposal

From: [email-masked] (Alexandre Belloni)
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:14:12 +0100

Hi,

On 06/01/2015 at 15:25:28 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
> Hello Wenyou,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 03:32:42AM +0000, Yang, Wenyou wrote:
> > 
> > I remembered you said this patch is not formal. Now, would you like 
> > send a formal one?
> 
> Here it is, the first one is based on linux-at91/linux-3.10-at91 branch, 
> the second one is rebased on linux-3.18 (Is this the right way when 
> playing with multiple branch?).

You can include that kind of information after the --- marker in the
patch so that it is clearer.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com