Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings

From: [email-masked] (Boris Brezillon)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:18:16 +0100

Hi Felipe,

On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600
Felipe Balbi <[email-masked]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use
> > "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since
> > this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <[email-masked]>
> > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email-masked]>
> 
> WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> #177: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1827:
> +       { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" },
> 
> WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,sama5d3-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> #178: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1828:
> +       { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc" },
> 
> please fix and resend. Also, when resending, could you add Nicolas'
> Acked-by since he's already given it ?

Actually these compatible strings are documented in the first patch
(where they were introduced), but I'll send a v4 with Nicolas' ack.

Thanks,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com