Subject: [RFC/PATCH] arm: omap: hwmod: add debugfs interface

From: [email-masked] (Felipe Balbi)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:11:44 -0600

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:36:03AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:13:57AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > 
> > > > By exposing the details of hwmod structures
> > > > to debugfs we can much more easily verify
> > > > that changes to hwmod data is correct and won't
> > > > cause regressions.
> > > > 
> > > > The idea is that this can be used to check the
> > > > state of one hwmod, verify hwmod sysc fields, etc.
> > > > 
> > > > For example, this will be used to move some of
> > > > the sysc fields to DT and later verify that they
> > > > are correct pre- and post-patch.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <[email-masked]>
> > > 
> > > This one had a bunch of unnecessary includes and checkpatch issues 
> > > (below).  I cleaned those up here and have queued the result (also below) 
> > > for v3.20.
> > 
> > ... and, the patch doesn't even boot.  Dropped.
> > 
> > If you really want something like this to be merged, resend a version that 
> > boots, and has checkpatch warnings fixed and unnecessary includes dropped.  
> > Otherwise you're just wasting my time.
> 
> you're using a really old version, though. There have been other
> versions which are still under discussion.

not to mention that this was an RFC, not meant for merging at the time
it was sent.

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150120/d50f40c9/attachment.sig>