Subject: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/atags: Export also for DT

From: [email-masked] (Pavel Machek)
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:18:40 +0100

Hi!

> In other words, what prevents someone from creating, say, a custom 
> minimal Barebox version that sits on top of the existing N900 
> bootloader?  Wouldn't that provide a much better user experience?

Lot of useless work, that would make user experience worse?

We have mostly working u-boot on N900. Its there, useful for boot
menus, but makes debugging tricky, so we want to keep working with
internal bootloader, too. And I have already explained this to you
before.

Now, would you stop assigning work to other people?

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html