Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] Documentation: DT: Document twl4030-madc-battery bindings

From: [email-masked] (Sebastian Reichel)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:36:54 +0100

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:43:17AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> No no, "capacity-uah" is what we should use, but you need an ack from
> the battery and device tree people that this is OK. Let's not add
> "ti,capacity-uah? as that can obviously be a generic property.

I'm okay with capacity-uah.

> > [...]
> 
> Oh if they are battery spicific, then ideally we'd have generic batery
> voltage to capacity maps property rather than a custom ti specific
> property.
> 
> To avoid extra hassles later on, maybe you could submit a generic
> binding patch only documenting it to the battery people and the device
> tree people? That will make it easier to maintain this driver in the
> long run.

Actually the proper way would be to differentiate between the
battery and the measurement chip / adc and that should be
implemented in the long run. The kernel's power supply framework
is not yet ready for it, though.

Example DT:

battery {
    battery-specific-data;
};

fuel-gauge {
    measures = <&battery>;
};

charger {
    charges = <&battery>;
};

Since infrastructure for generic bindings is missing, I think its
best to have the vendor properties for now and map this to generic
properties, once they have been specified.

-- Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150311/ba72c6cc/attachment.sig>