From: tony@atomide•com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:10:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150316181023.GT5264@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150316161449.GJ8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm•linux.org.uk> [150316 09:15]:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 08:44:10AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw•cz> [150302 03:32]:
> > > On Fri 2015-02-27 16:55:26, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > > This patch adds support for DT "/revision" and convert ATAG_REVISION to DT.
> > > >
> > > > Pali Roh?r (2):
> > > > arm: devtree: Set system_rev from DT revision
> > > > arm: boot: convert ATAG_REVISION to DT revision field
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw•cz>
> >
> > Are these queued somewhere now? Sounds like this is the last pending
> > issue for n900 to use legacy user space with current mainline kernels,
> > so I'd like to get these in so we can get closer to making omap3 boot
> > in device tree only mode.
>
> Not that I know of. As everyone is aware, patches need to be in my
> patch system if they want me to apply them - which would've been
> especially important as I was away from kernel stuff for a week at
> the start of March (for medical reasons) and I can't be expected to
> track the status of stuff which is buried behind 1000+ extra mails.
Pali, care to upload these two patches to Russell's patch tracking
system if no other comments?
> In any case, I'm currently not accepting /any/ patches into my tree at
> present; I'm chasing a horrid instability on one of my test platforms
> which is making it impossible to tell whether any particular change or
> changes in my tree is responsible or not for it. It doesn't seem to be
> a hardware failure (if it was, I'd simply take the board out of the
> nightly test system.)
>
> It's quite literally taking hours to figure out what's going on - I've
> been on this for about 12 hours now and still not much closer to knowing
> what's causing it (other than I know that -rc1 plus my queue seems to be
> fine, -rc3 plus my queue is definitely broken, -rc3 alone is fine. So
> something I'm already carrying seems to be responsible, but each time I
> identify a particular patch and drop _just_ that change, I find that the
> problem is back when I try my queue minus the bad changes. With a test
> cycle time of 20+ minutes (due to the number of boots required to make
> certain of a dependable result), this is /really/ slow progress.
>
> Right now, I can't be positively sure that /anything/ I have already
> merged isn't a factor in causing this problem, so I don't want to
> augment my tree with any additional patches which would upset my
> ability to move about in the tree, and get reproducable results from
> repeated testing. To merge something else will probably mean I'll
> have to start again from the beginning and the last 12 hours spent
> testing will have been wasted.
Oh debugging those things sucks. Maybe try with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB to
see if you trigger any poison.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-16 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-18 16:54 [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible Pali Rohár
2014-06-18 19:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-18 19:09 ` Pali Rohár
2014-06-18 19:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-19 8:21 ` Pavel Machek
2014-07-11 19:31 ` Pavel Machek
2014-06-18 19:07 ` Rob Herring
2014-06-18 19:22 ` Pali Rohár
2014-06-18 20:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-18 20:20 ` Pali Rohár
2014-06-18 21:53 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-11-24 22:16 ` Pali Rohár
2014-06-18 20:46 ` Rob Herring
2014-06-18 21:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-18 22:27 ` Rob Herring
2014-06-18 23:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-24 22:19 ` Pali Rohár
2014-12-04 0:33 ` Rob Herring
2014-12-04 0:48 ` Pali Rohár
2014-12-04 16:49 ` Rob Herring
2014-12-04 17:57 ` Pali Rohár
2014-12-04 18:10 ` Rob Herring
2015-01-26 19:09 ` [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision Pali Rohár
2015-01-26 20:22 ` Rob Herring
2015-01-30 14:14 ` Pali Rohár
2015-01-30 21:03 ` Rob Herring
2015-02-27 15:45 ` Pali Rohár
2015-02-27 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Pali Rohár
2015-02-27 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm: devtree: Set system_rev from DT revision Pali Rohár
2015-02-27 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: boot: convert ATAG_REVISION to DT revision field Pali Rohár
2015-03-02 11:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision Pavel Machek
2015-03-16 15:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 16:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-16 16:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-03-16 19:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-16 18:10 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-03-16 19:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-16 20:54 ` Pali Rohár
2015-03-16 20:59 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-26 22:34 ` [PATCH] " Andreas Färber
2015-02-27 15:56 ` Pali Rohár
2015-01-26 19:16 ` [PATCH] ARM: /proc/atags: Export also for DT Pali Rohár
2015-01-26 20:33 ` Rob Herring
2015-01-27 13:21 ` Pavel Machek
2015-01-27 14:16 ` Rob Herring
2015-01-27 14:24 ` Pavel Machek
2015-01-27 14:32 ` Pali Rohár
2015-01-27 17:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-27 20:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-01-27 21:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-27 21:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-01-27 21:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-01-27 22:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-28 2:07 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-01-28 6:21 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-28 7:19 ` Pavel Machek
2015-01-28 8:06 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-28 8:25 ` Pavel Machek
2015-01-28 7:18 ` Pavel Machek
2015-01-28 13:38 ` Pali Rohár
2015-01-27 23:10 ` Pavel Machek
2015-01-28 0:50 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-28 13:58 ` Pali Rohár
2015-01-28 14:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-01-28 15:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-28 15:47 ` Pali Rohár
2015-01-28 15:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-28 16:31 ` Jason Cooper
2015-01-28 15:57 ` Rob Herring
2015-01-28 16:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-28 16:19 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-28 17:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-28 17:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-28 17:18 ` Pali Rohár
2015-01-28 18:00 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-28 19:33 ` Pali Rohár
2015-01-28 18:03 ` Pavel Machek
2015-01-28 19:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-28 14:46 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-27 19:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-01-26 20:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-26 20:44 ` Pali Rohár
2014-12-04 19:00 ` [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible Pali Rohár
2014-12-04 10:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-18 21:10 ` Aaro Koskinen
2014-07-11 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
2014-11-24 22:21 ` Pali Rohár
2014-09-05 11:38 ` Pali Rohár
2014-09-05 12:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-10 12:46 ` Pavel Machek
2014-11-24 22:23 ` Pali Rohár
2014-09-05 13:45 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-05 13:52 ` Pali Rohár
2014-09-05 13:58 ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-24 22:25 ` Pali Rohár
2014-09-05 13:58 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-11-24 22:27 ` Pali Rohár
2014-09-06 15:34 ` Andreas Färber
2014-11-24 22:29 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150316181023.GT5264@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox