Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] Documentation: DT: Document twl4030-madc-battery bindings

From: [email-masked] (Pavel Machek)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:05:32 +0100

On Wed 2015-02-04 23:14:32, Marek Belisko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  .../bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..bb3580c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +twl4030_madc_battery
> +
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible : "ti,twl4030-madc-battery"
> + - capacity-uah : battery capacity in uAh

Could we make it capacity-uAh ?

> + - volt-to-capacity-charging-map : list of voltage(mV):level(%) values
> +	for charging calibration (see example)
> + - volt-to-capacity-discharging-map : list of voltage(mV):level(%) values
> +	for discharging calibration (see example)

Would "mV-to-capacity..." be more accurate? Also, would it make sense
to introduce coefficients for temperature and discharge rate?

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html