Subject: [PATCH 01/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed to reflect behaviour

From: [email-masked] (Ingo Molnar)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:49:45 +0200

* Laurent Pinchart <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Tuesday 31 March 2015 09:14:52 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Daniel Lezcano <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > > From: Laurent Pinchart <[email-masked]>
> > > 
> > > The arch_timer_probed function returns whether the given time doesn't
> > > need to be probed. This can be the case when the timer has been probed
> > > already, but also when it has no corresponding enabled node in DT.
> > > 
> > > Rename the function to arch_timer_need_probe and invert its return value
> > > to better reflect the function's purpose and behaviour.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <[email-masked]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > > <[email-masked]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email-masked]>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 13 +++++++------
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > > b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c index a3025e7..50bb7f2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > > @@ -661,17 +661,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> > > arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {> 
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  static bool __init
> > > 
> > > -arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
> > > +arch_timer_need_probe(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
> > 
> > If we do a rename we might as well use valid English spelling such as
> > 'arch_timer_needs_probing()'?
> 
> Of course. Should I resend the patch or can you fix that while applying it ?

No need to resend, I've done the rename in the patch.

Thanks,

	Ingo